Published on Tuesday, 5 May 2026 at 1:30:00 PM
The City's response to Kalgoorlie Miner about the clean-up at 364–378 Piccadilly Street, Lamington.
Question 1. Why has the City requested these items be removed?
Response: The City requested the removal of temporary fencing, stored materials and other items because they are located on public land without approval.
Recent inspections identified unauthorised structures, dumped materials, manure and general site condition issues across both City-owned and Crown land. The City has a responsibility to manage public land in line with its statutory obligations.
The request was made as part of a clean-up and compliance process, not as a response to one single issue.
Question 2: Did the City receive complaints about the area?
Response: Yes. The City has received complaints and service requests about the area over a number of years, including concerns about land use, dumped materials and environmental health impacts. The City is aware that this is an area that the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage has also previously investigated.
Question 3: The area seems to have been established for around 30 years. Why has it become an issue for the City?
Response: The City understands this area has been used informally by some community members for many years and recognises that it has been valued by local riders.
However, recent inspections have identified a number of concerns that need to be addressed, including dumped materials, manure, unauthorised structures, and broader public liability implications.
While the City acknowledges the history of use at the site, it also has a responsibility to manage public land in line with its legal and environmental obligations. For that reason, the matter now needs to be worked through with those directly involved.
Question 4: Does the City believe the amount of notice given to the residents was an appropriate timeframe for the removal?
Response: The original correspondence was issued because officers had not been able to clearly identify all users of the site, so adjoining property owners were notified. Since then, a number of interested users have come forward. On that basis, the City is proposing to pause immediate removal activity to allow further discussion with affected users.
The City would like to work with community to find a fair resolution, while still addressing the unauthorised use and condition of the site.
Question 5: Could a permit be approved to keep the area established?
Response: The City understands the value this area provides for some local riders and recognises the concerns raised by those who have used the land over a long period of time.
At this stage, however, the City does not support formalising the current use of the land. There are a number of matters that require consideration, including public liability and insurance, environmental health concerns, the use extending across both City-owned and Crown land, and the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage’s position that the unauthorised use should cease.
The City’s preference is to support horse-related activities through established and endorsed equestrian facilities, where use can be appropriately approved, insured, maintained and managed long term.
Question 6: Are there plans for the vacant land to be used for something else in the immediate future?
Response: Not at this stage. The current action is not being driven by an immediate development proposal or alternative use for the land.The matter relates to the City’s responsibility to manage public land accordingly, including addressing unauthorised use, dumped materials, environmental health concerns and public liability risks.
Question 7: Is it true the area is being considered for a mining camp?
Response: No, this is not true. The City is not considering the site for a mining camp.
Question 8: Can the City suggest other vacant land in the area that could be used by horses and riders for this purpose?
Response: The City understands local riders are seeking practical options, and this will be discussed further at the upcoming engagement meeting, as outlined below, with nearby residents and identified interested parties.
Question 9: Is there anything else you would like to say?
Response: Following recent contact from community members, the City is arranging an engagement meeting with nearby residents and identified interested parties next week. The City understands the issues raised by those currently using the land and wants to provide an opportunity for discussion, while also explaining the history of the matter, the concerns identified, and the City’s responsibilities in managing public land.
For Further Information contact:
City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder
Media and Public Relations
Email: comms@ckb.wa.gov.au
Call: 0439 598 330
Back to All News